Visit most any winemaking region the world over and you'll find that restaurant wine lists are chock full of locally made wines. Go to a restaurant in Napa and you'll find wine lists dominated by Napa wines rather than Spanish ones. In Tuscany, you'll find Chianti and Super Tuscans, not Australian Shiraz. You get the idea.
But sit down at most East End restaurants and Long Island wines are far from the focus—if there are any on the list at all. I know that it makes me crazy when I'm out there and I want to drink a wine from a winery I'm not visiting that day and all I see on the list are names like Yellow Tail, Beringer, Mondavi and Cavit.
There are exceptions of course. Places like Fifth Season (Greenport) and North Fork Table (Southold) have lists with plenty of local options. Unfortunately, Fifth Season ignores many top bottles, but hey, at least they focus on local, right?
Sadly these types of forward-thinking restaurants are the exception rather than the rule however. Then again, is it really forward thinking if much of the world is already acting this way?
Many local winemakers and winery owners aren't happy about this situation, saying that local restaurants should support the wine industry better. Many restaurants respond by pointing to high prices and low demand as two major reasons they don’t.
Both sides of the argument are right—to a point. What is really needed is an partnership between the two groups. One founded in a common goal—financial success.
So how do we get there? Here’s my take.
Wineries shouldn't expect restaurants to approach them. If you want your wines on more lists—put a mixed case of wines in your trunk and hit the road. Obviously many of you are already doing this, but be even more diligent and pushy if need be. Keep going back and taste with the chefs if you can. They can be your in-restaurant champions.
Restaurants need to pick better wines for their lists. Don't just pay lip service to “pouring local” —do it well. Too many restaurants pour only one or two cheap, insipid Long Island wines that don’t the region any favors. If a customer tries local wines for the first time at those restaurants, they aren't going to have a good experience, the restaurant look bad and demand for local wines is diminished. Put good bottles on your list—or none at all. Only offering Pindar's Winter White does the entire region a disservice.
Price the wines so restaurants can profit and customers will buy them. No one is suggesting that you should give your wines away just to get them on lists, but restaurants need to make money and a large percentage of their money is made on alcohol. At the same time, marking up a $35 red blend to $100 or more is ridiculous. Be reasonable and you’ll sell more wine. There's got to be a price point at which winery, restaurant and customer all benefit, right?
Remember that this is a symbiotic relationship. This seems obvious, but in the craziness of running a winery or restaurant, it might get lost. If the wineries succeed, that brings more people to wine country—more people who will need to eat somewhere. And, if the restaurants introduce new people to local wines, the wineries benefit as well.
Long Island wine lovers should be asking for them at their favorite restaurants. I order Long Island wine almost every time I dine out. I do so not because I'm blindly supporting a region and industry that I care about, but because the wines are so food friendly—particularly when compared to many wines from California, Australia and South America.
End of rant...but I really hope the region can come together b






I'll join this rant. All of the same applies to the Finger Lakes and surrounding areas. Actually, Ithaca is probably a lot better than Syracuse but I can't help but think of the impact that could be made if more of our local restaurants carried local wine. Elderberry Pond Farm Restaurant in Auburn has an excellent list that is mostly Finger Lakes with a few California and French bottles--and one LI if I remember correctly. The Stone Cat Cafe in Hector is also good at this--but they should be, they have a tasting room attached to their building and stellar wineries up the road on the east side of Seneca Lake.
I also think part of it is demand. Like you, I make it a point to tell restaurants of the good local wines that I'd recommend for their lists or I'll simply ask why they don't have any listed. The most common answer is that it is a distribution issue (an area I'm sorely ignorant about) but I can't believe it is easier to get wine from Australia than to have it driven 40 miles up the road.
I'm also advocating for a tasting room in downtown Syracuse for when you just can't get to Keuka Lake. There should be a Vintage New York wine store in all of the NY wine Regions, not just the Hudson Valley or Soho.
Posted by: Jennifer | May 08, 2007 at 01:29 PM
Very well put, and applies to any up and coming wine region. I think local wineries will find most restaurants are dying to get good local wines on their lists because of the value added (see the 4th point.) The only other thing I would add is to be aware that a good by-the-glass program can turn any restaurant into an extension of your tasting room.
Posted by: el jefe | May 08, 2007 at 09:26 PM
I think the mark-up issue is key. Since many local wineries do not produce the same bulk as their Australian and Californian counterparts, the price is higher. Restaurants seem to want to keep the mark-up rates fairly universal, so the consumer is left with choosing a decent and reliable Californian wine at $40 or taking a chance with a local wine at $60. That many choose the former is quite understandable.
I spoke to a beverage manager at a local (Syracuse) Wine Spectator list restuarant, and he told me that they always assume to mark up the wines at about the same rate unless they are persuaded otherwise by market forces. A sure-fire Bordeaux will receive this adjustment if it doesn't sell, but I'm sure local wines are simply dropped from the list since it is sometimes unclear which deserve a chance to sell at an adjusted price and which simply will not please the consumer no matter what price is asked.
I do think advocacy on the part of the winery is key. Without human-to-human contact, a restaurant is not likely to treat a given wine any differently. Like most people, I'm sure a restaurant's wine guy would be more willing to make slightly less money on a local wine if he knows that he's supporting a great local product. Goodness knows the old stand-bys (French, Californian, Australian) will always sell well.
Posted by: Jason Feulner | May 08, 2007 at 11:33 PM
The whole subject of markups just highlights the issue of self-distribution by wineries to local markets. In California we are able to do this, and we price our wine for the local restaurants and stores a small delta above the price we sell to distributors. This lets the restaurants (especially) set a decent markup for themselves that stays not too far above the MSRP. Without self-dist. an unnecessary middleperson takes a cut for doing nothing (see Virginia too) which has the negative result of soaking the consumer...
Another great thing many of our local restaurants do is waive corkage on local wines. This creates a different synergy since wineries are more likely to recommend those restaurants... hopefully the same thing can happen in Long Island, perhaps with some co-promotional activities.
Posted by: el jefe | May 09, 2007 at 02:17 AM
Can't agree more. Living in NYC when ever I go out to a nice dinner I ask waiter if they have any LI wines and most of the time it is just to bust balls as they don't and my wife is pretty sick of it. Unfortunately the response is usually becasue they don't have the demand....now the idiots at the liquor store have a different response but that is a another story.
Posted by: gins | May 09, 2007 at 07:38 AM
My wife owns a wine shop in Putnam County NY and we have been trying to find the NY distributors of Ex Libris Cab of Washington State. We have a customers that want it any one know the name?
Mark
Posted by: mark williams | June 27, 2007 at 12:28 PM