A friend and reader sent this to me this morning. He's a Virginia resident and is on many winery email lists down in that neck of the woods:
Dear Friends,
Last week/weekend (July 19-23), I took the Acela train up to New York to visit my daughter. On Saturday evening, my friends all drove up to join us for a trip out onto Long Island. I'm embarrassed to say that after all these years I had never visited this other notable East Coast wine region, and we were all excited about visiting and tasting their wines. I envisioned tasting high-quality wines that I thought would be real competition to those from our region.
Well, not to worry, 'cause they've got nothin' on us! I was absolutely surprised that the quality wasn't higher. Many of their wines were overly lean, too thin - lacking body and elegance. Some were just downright mouth-puckering, face-scrunching acidic. Certainly, there was some high-quality, delicious offerings, but frankly, they were the exceptions. Over the years, I had seen many listings in consumer wine publications for Long Island wines and I guess I just assumed that their quality warranted the exposure they received in the press. But that's not the case. Not that they shouldn't be reported on, of course, but what is confusing, I think, is why Virginia is not reported on more frequently and extensively. The fact is that the press is just in the dark about what's happening in Virginia. We're producing many wines of great character, intensity and elegance from those varieties that we can ripen properly here.
They say the tipping point for Virginia wines is near. After my visit to Long Island, I can't help but think that, indeed, we're on the right track and it's only a matter of time.
(Note: Both my friend and I made some edits to protect the somewhat-innocent)
Now, my experience with Virginia wines isn't vast. I've had some very nice viognier and cabernet franc...and even an amazing petit verdot. Beyond that, I just don't have much experience with the wines....and that's why you'll never see me making generalized, blanket statements about Virginia wines.
The fact that this VA winery owner feels the need to bash Long Island wines to promote his own doesn't make me mad, not at all. In fact, it just saddens me. I've been covering Long Island wine for over three years now, and I've never once heard anyone in the industry bash Virginia or its wines. That this winery owner would bash another East Coast region is pathetic and I wonder just how many Long Island wines he tasted in his trip here.
Is every Long Island wine delicious and world class? Heck no. But it's completely unfair, and a bit whiny, to say what he did. If he sees this post, I hope that he'll send me his wines, which I'll taste blind against the same varietals from Long Island. Could be a fun exercise.





As a lifelong Virginia resident and wine lover, I can assure you that we have our share of crap down here too.
I've purchased more bottles of Virginia wine that I've simply dumped down the drain than I care to reflect on and have been bitten by numerous thin, hot wines crafted by inexperienced wine makers.
As you correctly note, Virginia also have several producers of viognier that put many Washington State producers to shame, many wonderful, if underrated, cabernet francs and both Linden and Pearmund make a great petit verdot.
Like Long Island, Virginia is coming into its own in the world of wine making. There will be good years and bad years. Good bottles and really terrible bottles.
I happen to see that as part of the fun of living in this region. (How terrible it must be to live in Napa where everything is good). Every year brings improvement to the craft, the community that supports it and perhaps most importantly, we Virginians are able to enjoy a now centuries old story about the production of wine in our state.
With that in mind, I'd like to apologize on behalf of my fellow Virginian. It was inappropriate to make those statements given the conditions of wine making in both Long Island and Virginia.
Regarding your comment about a blind tasting, I'd love to see your notes on something like that. If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know.
Posted by: Tripp Fenderson | August 06, 2007 at 11:57 AM
Can we assume he went to Pindar, king of all LI wine generalizations?
Posted by: Jeff | August 06, 2007 at 12:10 PM
Thanks for the comment. No need to apologize for your fellow Virginian of course, I think most anyone reading that will assume he's the exception rather than the rule.
What other grapes do best in VA?
And trust me, there plenty of Napa wines that aren't any good either. But I bet you know that too!
And, thanks for the offer, if we can figure out who the author was, maybe we'll do the tasting without him :)
And Jeff...I never assume anything. Maybe the wines he found to be over acidic were chardonnay...because he's used to flabby, over-oaked ones? I never assume anything in cases like this one.
Posted by: Lenn | August 06, 2007 at 12:30 PM
We don't have a unified growing region given the diverse soils, elevations and climate conditions.
That said, I believe Cabernet Franc, Petit Verdot and Viognier would best represent the state. Some would add Norton, which I happen to enjoy, but it's a bit rough for the uninitiated. :)
We also have a couple of solid Cabernet Sauvignon producers in the state but IMHO, they're exceptions and their success is a direct reflection of the winemaker's experience rather than Virginia's growing conditions, which can be extremely challenging at times.
Posted by: Tripp Fenderson | August 06, 2007 at 01:05 PM
Greetings Friends,
I echo the thoughts of my fellow Virginian, Tripp. I will say that this is one person’s view – just a shame that this person happens to be a winery owner from the Old Dominion. Appears that they jumped into the glass with preconceived expectations, opposed to just visiting a new wine region and enjoying themselves. I guess that is why I enjoy tasting blind - Leave the baggage at the front door.
NY and VA are newer wine producing regions facing many challenges; VA is truly experimental and adventurous – From Albariño to Pinotage, it is grown and produced here. There is still a learning curve where growers are trying to figure out what varieties are well suited for the states soil and climate type and the winemakers are still refining their art. I’m sure the same thing is going on there. With these trails, sometimes by fire, you may get a surprisingly great wine, or you might get a wine that is uninteresting – but albeit palatable – just dull. With that, I visit a number of VA wineries and highlight the good on my Virginia blog – there are bad grapes here and there, but overall this young wine region can hold their heads up high.
Emerging white wine grapes that grow well and are finding a home in VA would be Petit Manseng, Viognier, Chardonnay, Seyval Blanc, Vidal Blanc, Pinot Gris, Traminette, etc.
For the reds: Cabernet Franc, Petit Verdot, Malbec, Tannat, Norton, etc.
You see, only one grape variety from the Big 6 here. VA really shines with these minor blending red wine grapes – I see good things ahead for all of those red wine grape varieties mentioned. Those hardy hybrids do well also, but not too many people know their names (yet). I visited the Finger Lakes last year, and hope to make a Long Island trip before years end.
Somehow I think my review will be quite different from Author X.
Happy Sipping!
Dezel
Posted by: Dezel | August 06, 2007 at 01:17 PM
Amateurish region-bashing aside, sympathy for Virginia first-class producers comes easily. Many of their wines are first-rate and deserve a larger presence in the Darwinian Manhattan market, as do, incidentally, certain Pennsylvania and New Jersey wines.
For reasons unclear, Virginia’s producers and ever-broadening achievements remain under the wine media’s radar except for an occasional back-of-the-book overview.
When I last checked the situation, a few years back, I found that Virginia wines lacked a crucial imprimatur: a sizeable presence in Washington, D.C. fine-wine shops.
The best explanation --- if indeed it was an explanation --- that I could find was that the capital is an international city and that Virginia wines were perceived as provincial. Who would “buy Virginia” if you could “buy French” when a lobbyist took you to an upscale restaurant?
You and I and other readers of Lenndevours, tuned into the virtues of regionalism, probably would check the wine list at the Inn at Little Washington for a potentially lovely Virginia cabernet. But we can guess that high-rollers who spend the weekend there would regard it as an asterisk and head instead for a Bordeaux First Growth.
The next wave --- a rising tide of wine regionalism --- probably will hold the ticket to Virginia wines’ coast-to-coast reputation. With wine now made in all 50 states, Virginia will indeed become known --- though God, if asked when, might answer, “Not in My lifetime.”
Posted by: Howard G. Goldberg | August 06, 2007 at 06:23 PM
Howard: It seems odd to me that the "drink local" thing hasn't taken root in the DC area. It's so prevalent here to almost be cliche these days!
Posted by: Lenn | August 06, 2007 at 08:27 PM
Lenn: The central problem, I think, in the D.C. area is that there is, in a real sense, no "local" thing.
D.C. is essentially a transient community to which everyone comes to grab a piece of the pie and from which everyone returns home. Only the poor --- you know who they are --- get left behind; they don't drink viognier.
With an identity built on ephemera, with the nearby Virginia and Maryland suburbs somewhat fed by that same phenomenon, "local" cannot take root.
At least, that's my two-cent theory.
Posted by: Howard G. Goldberg | August 06, 2007 at 08:29 PM
I say we expose this winery owner and tar and feather him! I'm sorry that whole Dateline journalist at the Hacker Conference news got me amped up. Criticizing another region's wine to make yours look better is ingenius marketing. He should start a "bad" wine blog on his winery website.
Posted by: Bryan | August 06, 2007 at 09:32 PM
My wife's grandmother has a cousin who owns a prominent Virginia winery (never spoken to this person or met him in person).
I hope I don't have a family scandal in the works!
Anyway, I've had a bottle or two of their wine and was not blown away, but it wasn't awful either. I'm looking forward to tasting more in the future...you know, when the feud settles down.
Posted by: Jason Feulner | August 06, 2007 at 11:54 PM
Lenn- I think LI has a long way to go before the "drink local" movement really catches on. Now I have been out of the loop for a year but the farther west you traveled the slimmer the pickings for LI wines. NYers are still not realizing the full potential of LI's wine region and it is still in danger of becoming a touristy region.
Not to kiss up to anyone but Mr. Goldberg has done a great deal of getting and keeping LI wines in the consumers brains and this blog has been great edition to the LI Wine cause (ever think of taking over the wine council?)
Anyway what were we talking about?
Posted by: phermented1 | August 07, 2007 at 08:27 AM
As many of my LI friends know, I just relocated to Richmond, VA.
Last Saturdy, I went to a four-winery 'Beach Party'/wine tasting at James River Cellars (located on that good old highway, US 1, north of Richmond by about 10 miles.
I found that the off-dry whites the wineries poured were the most consistent and the best values.
The Chards were OK, just like anywhere else, maybe a little flabby. More specifics later.
Dan McGurn
Posted by: DMcG | August 07, 2007 at 05:29 PM
My first exposure to Virginia wines came seven years ago, whe my wife and I celebrated our fifth anniversary at The Inn at Little Washington. We shared a bottle of White Hall Cabernet Franc with dinner and I was sold on Virginia wines ever since.
Being a native Long Islander, whenever I visit the East End, I always make sure I bring some bottles back with me. Both regions have a lot ot offer.
Posted by: Ray | August 19, 2007 at 08:48 PM
viognier, seyval blanc, vidal blanc and chardonnay often do well in VA.
have also had decent cab/cabfranc and even a zinfindel that wasnt bad.
in general virginia wines are over priced. high prices and the lack of broad-based quality i believe are why VA wines have not gotten better exposure.
Posted by: guy | October 02, 2007 at 07:32 PM