« Fox Run Vineyards 2005 Reserve Cabernet Franc | Main | What We'll Be Doing at PALATE This Week »

February 13, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d0dbb53ef011278d685ed28a4

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Tale of Two Niagaras:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bryan, I would contend that even visitors to the Finger Lakes face the same situation. While there are a lot of wineries dedicated primarily to vinifera, these wineries are not clustered in one location, and therefore a visitor travelling down the road may encounter several wineries with a non-vinifera emphasis between wineries that offer dryer fair.

I guess each type of drinker should find their own place, no big deal. Where I think this is can be a problem for the industry as a whole is when a visitor who enjoys vinifera randomly selects a few stops and leaves the region disappointed or confused by the sweet stuff they've encountered. There are enough wineries to satisfy their palate, and yet the physical layout of the region has convinced them to not look to the Finger Lakes for future wine consumption. The lack of their purchasing loyalty hurts the industry as a whole, no matter what their personal tastes.

Hang in there--it's nice hearing about the wineries in the Niagara region that are trying to make vinifera work for them.

We have the same issue in New England. I think part of the problem is that many of the dry vinifera wines are just, how can I put this...god awful. There are pockets of more established grape growers/wine-makers who have already done their trial and error and have zeroed in on the vinifera that can really do well in that locale. For others, the only vinifera varietals that are remotely palatable (particularly where reds are concerned) are the sweets.

Labrusca and Hybrid = sweet wine. Wrong.

"They can be quickly turned around, don’t require barrels and don’t demand the same attention as their vinifera cousins. " DEAD WRONG. Just because that is how they are often treated dosnt make that true. I dont know what kind of wines you expect to produce working on that assumption. The only difference is we have had thousands of years to work with vinifera, and only a few hundred with labrusca and hybrids. Be patient grasshopper.

I did make an error in linking hybrid and native in the same thought. Hybrid grapes can be done dry with success.

Native grapes on the other hand are naturally more acidic and, generally speaking, need sugar to balance them out.

The fact that hybrid grapes are bred to be more cold hardy and disease resistant does in fact make them easier to grow and require less strategy when choosing vineyard sites.

Baco and Vidal are two shining examples of hybrids and I do feel that I shouldn't generalize such a large class of grapes.

Thanks for the comments, they are much appreciated!

of course these are two different issues, wine makeing and grape growing.

Im only begining to learn winemaking, so I cant state with certainty how, but I know there are ways to work around high acid. The most obvious is to use them in a blend. In the old world tradition of winemaking their are many more blended wines than varietals.

Ill half agree with you about hybrid hardiness. They are for people who have no choice in their vineyard site, aka the farmer or person who already has land, maybe 4 or 5 miles away from the river (im in the Hudson valley, substitute your big water), and plants grapes on it. In a non ideal vineyard situation, hybrids and natives will probably always out perform vinifera. But regardless of the varietal, you only get the best from it at the best sites (well actully thats just step one, as we all know).

Bryan I agree with your thoughts on Baco and Vidal - I think they can be very enjoyable. I've also had some real nice Traminette, Chambourcin and Cayuga blends over the years.
As many of you know there is a worldwide effort to promote and grow indigenous varieties from various regions. We should look at natives and hybrids with the same view. Frankly, I find drinking these wines a refreshing change from the sometimes monolithic flavors experienced with tasting the same noble vinifera.
In addition, natives and hybrids offer a pathway to complete certified organic grape production in the northeast - something that more growers should take advantage of as the market demand grows for these types of wines.

True wine lovers can appreciate all wines, no matter the grape parentage. Labrusca grapes are capable of producing balanced, aromatically complex wines. And they can be much more difficult to make well than vinifera wines.

Based on my extensive tastings in the Niagara region over the past 3 years, I highly recommend Honeymoon Trail for Catawba and Diamond, and Schulze for a sparkling Catawba that is NY wine history in a glass. (the entire NY industry was based on sparkling Catawba for many years)

Brian, you should also consider a post related to fruit wines in the Niagara region. As the region is primarily orchards, many wineries are producing exceptional fruit wines from local fruit.

In the Finger Lakes, Baco Noir and Vidal Blanc are planted and produced in proliferation. They do make some very nice wines throughout the region. Mind you, Hybrids such as Traminette, Noiret and Corot Noir to name a few of Cornell's recent victories are being planted all over the FL and have produced some stellar results in a short time span.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Long Island Restaurant Week

The Cork Reports are protected under a...

  • Creative Commons License

Empire State Cellars


A Taste of Summer


Experience Finger Lakes

NYCR Advertisers




Become a NYCR Sponsor