By Evan Dawson, Finger Lakes Editor
Photos by Morgan Dawson Photography
We were getting nowhere. Our initial evaluations of the Finger Lakes white wine flight had produced no clear choice for Wine of the Year. We had summoned only one conclusion:
These were excellent wines and choosing one seemed nearly impossible.
Slowly we began to pare down the six wines (everything was done blind), and our conversation focused on the search for balance. Which wines showcased the regional strengths most profoundly? We never did reach a unanimous conclusion, which I found healthy. But we were pleased with the selection of Billsboro Winery 2008 Riesling.
First of all, about 50 cases are still available, selling for $16 -- a tremendous value -- in the Billsboro tasting room and through BDL Wines in places like Century Liquor in Rochester.
Winemaker Vinny Aliperti describes this wine as "crunchy," referencing the strong dose of natural acid that measures 10.9 grams/liter. But he arrested fermentation to balance the wine with 2.5% residual sugar. The result is a wine that almost ostentatiously displays a long list of regional and varietal characteristics. And it's a wine that is showy, yet crisp and cutting.
This was the first time Aliperti had ever arrested fermentation instead of back-sweetening the riesling for his Billsboro label.
"In theory, arresting fermentation should enhance the way it feels in the mouth," Aliperti says, referencing the fact that a more complex sugar is left in the wine after arresting fermentation as compared to back-sweetening. "But you'd need a pretty large trial to see if that's the case. We're certainly very happy with the way this wine turned out."
We haven't surveyed Finger Lakes winemakers, but it seems safe to say that a majority still prefer to back-sweeten their semi-dry and semi-sweet rieslings. It will be interesting to see if more decide to arrest fermentations.
The fruit for this wine comes from one of the strongest vineyard sites in the Finger Lakes: Sawmill Creek Vineyard on the southeast side of Seneca Lake.
According to Cornell University, this site is one of the steepest in the region, providing excellent air flow and combining with the soils to produce ideal riesling fruit. There is no current hierarchy of Finger Lakes Grand Cru vineyard sites, but this is one that would almost certainly be on such a list.
"Sites like Sawmill and Atwater (Vineyards) give you everything you could want," Aliperti says. "They have the southeast exposure and the steep slope, so you get that late-day sun bouncing up the lake."
Aliperti takes an approach during harvest that some might find surprising. Unlike many of his colleagues, Aliperti does not care to extend the growing season for riesling into November if possible. "I really don't want to see the grapes dehydrate," he says. "Not even a little. I want the grapes to maintain their natural acid while also achieving excellent ripeness, but that doesn't necessarily mean the longest possible hang-time. I've been burned before by waiting too long to pick, and it can affect balance."
While the Finger Lakes white flight was an arduous process for the judges, it was no contest when we brought out the flight for New York White Wine of the Year. The Billsboro stood out quickly for its precision and character.
The tasting also showcased the challenge for judges when a flight of wines show a range of styles and sugar levels. The Finger Lakes white flight included five rieslings: two were nearly bone dry, one was just under 1% sugar, and the other two measured 2.5% and 2.6%. Making the judging more difficult, the two driest wines were poured last for the judges.
That's not to say that this was a case of "Low-Cut Dress Syndrome," a phrase coined by writer Matt Kramer to explain why some of the showiest, biggest wines in a flight of red wines often are selected over others. They're easy to enjoy and require less consideration.
Does such a scenario unfold in a flight of white wines, too? I think it's possible. In the future I'd make sure that the dry wines are poured first in such a flight. But when you consider the quality of the Billsboro 2008 Riesling, and the source of the fruit, and the thoughtful approach of an outstanding winemaker, and the combination of power and balance in this wine, the selection of this wine shouldn't surprise anyone.
Wine importer and riesling fanatic Terry Theise recently lamented that dry riesling remains "a niche of a niche market" that he would like to see expand.
Later this year, we'll be writing more about the challenge of making an exceptional dry riesling. Crafting a compelling dry riesling is a difficult art to master. But the success of the Billsboro 2008 Riesling (and the Anthony Road 2008 Semi-Dry Riesing, winner of the Governor's Cup) are an indication that the Finger Lakes can showcase its sense of place at all levels of riesling sweetness. A rich, powerful style can maintain the acidity to balance the flavors, preventing the wine from becoming cloyingly sweet.
There are few better examples than the one produced by Vinny Aliperti at Billsboro.





Arresting fermention has become de rigueur for most of the older, quality Riesling producers in Germany. These producers are almost always practicing spontaneous fermentation as well which makes the task somewhat easier to achieve.
Congrats to Billsboro and the other winners. You make us proud!
Posted by: R. Olsen-Harbich | January 25, 2010 at 06:11 PM
Rich,
On our recent visit out to taste the wines of Erie/Chautauqua, a winemaker there told me about back-sweetening, "It's just easier. You can't convince most people to take a more difficult path."
But of course the more difficult path is often the most rewarding. Perhaps we'll put together some larger sample-size trials for later this year to determine whether there is a discernible difference. I suspect there is.
On another note, that photo of the wine swirling in the glass is one of my favorite, ever. My wife does some pretty cool things with the camera.
Posted by: Evan Dawson | January 25, 2010 at 06:42 PM
Great Post Evan, gave me and education. Before I finished reading the post I mentioned that I too like that photo of the swirling wine glass.
Question..how was the fermentation stopped?
Posted by: Michael Gorton, Jr. | January 25, 2010 at 07:04 PM
I'm proud that those are my fingers and my glass a-swirlin'
Rich, when you were making riesling (and I know you are again) are you back sweetening, or arresting? Or are you letting it go to dryness if it wants to. I know with your current focus on spontaneous fermentation, you might have a unique angle on this.
Posted by: Lenn Thompson | January 25, 2010 at 07:16 PM
I have never had a "crunchy" wine, but it sounds delicious!
Posted by: Shannon Casey | January 25, 2010 at 07:34 PM
Michael
Generally a fermentation can be stopped by chilling the fermenting juice to around 40 degrees. This is the temp that the yeast will stop doing its thing.
The juice is then filtered enough to take the yeast out and then sulfured to prevent spoilage and any leftover yeast from starting up another fermentation.
I suppose you could also choose a yeast that dies off at low alcohol too to achieve an arrested fermentation.
Another trick is to use encapsulated yeast that is much easier to remove from the fermenting juice.
Everyone
The act of arresting fermentation takes a great deal of skill and foresight to predict how the finished wine will show its acidity with the remaining sugar and alcohol. When you decide the juice has fermented to the balance of acid, alcohol and sugar you want, you just can't flick a switch and shut it down. It takes time to chill the juice down and it will keep fermenting until it reached that low temp.
It has been a surprise that a region known for Riesling doesn't use more arrested fermentations, but I understand this is much easier to achieve in smaller batches.
Posted by: Bryan Calandrelli | January 25, 2010 at 08:14 PM
Bryan: Thanks for pointing that out. I suppose some people also add sorbate to prevent re-fermenation?
Everyone: Grape must sugars are a mix of fructose and glucose (and other non-fermentables), but in most cases, yeast preferentially consume glucose. The only difference I can forsee in backsweetened vs. chaptalized/untreated musts (i.e., same alcohol level, etc.) is that the sugar left over from fermentation will be mostly FRUCTOSE in the non-backsweetened, while it will be SUCROSE (or if invertase is still around or it's a süssreserve, about 50/50 glucose/fructose) if back-sweetened.
These sugars ARE perceived differently, and fructose is significantly sweeter than glucose/sucrose (almost 2-fold).
I suppose the above-mentioned experiment proceeds thusly: Find a bottle of dry-as-dry-can-be Riesling (Ravines, etc.). Backsweeten to the same percentage with sucrose, glucose, and fructose and taste blind (triangle test) to see if there is a difference.
Of course, adding sugar before fermentation does change the environment in which the yeast are fermenting, so it's possible that that has an effect as well.
Also, maybe arrested fermentation wines are made from riper grapes in general, leading to greater development of other aroma compounds...
Posted by: Tom Mansell | January 25, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Bryan - Great stuff. Regarding your surprise that it's not more common: Obviously, in cases like the Wine of the Year, it's becoming more common. A guy like Vinny Aliperti is a tremendously skilled winemaker, and he wouldn't give this method a try if he didn't expect to find some value in it. Of course, I don't mean to imply that it's the be-all, end-all. But as the regional winemaking improves, more will feel confident in attempting the more difficult methods.
I'm interested in seeing a large trial to find out if there is a detectable difference, but I'll say this: I like the results thus far. Anthony Road arrests fermentation, and we know the quality of those wines. Now Billsboro. Wiemer has been doing it for years. There are others. It's an interesting discussion.
Posted by: Evan Dawson | January 25, 2010 at 10:24 PM
@Bryan...Thanks for explaining it. I understand the process now and I can understand how someone would back sweeten.
@Tom...Thanks for the explanation of the different sugars that come about. That would be an interesting tasting and would love to see the results.
Posted by: Michael Gorton, Jr. | January 26, 2010 at 07:28 AM
Lenn - years ago the process of using süssreserve was more common and was the main way quality Rieslings were sweetend. (Süssreserve is produced by holding a small amount of fresh juice aside and keeping it unfermented through the use of sulfur and filtration.) I remember the debate at one wine workshop in Geneva where the discussion centered on whether additions of straight sugar or süssreserve made any difference and if one could taste the difference. The Cornell guys (none of whom are there anymore) argued that no one can really distinguised between the two. Needless to say many winemakers disagreed.
There is a clear winemaking advantage to having the balance of a wine clearly in place before a final addition of sweetness. This is especially true if you have lots of grapes from different vineyards every year. However I like the practice of arresting fermentation simply because I believe it creates a more seamless wine. There is no need for the wine to "knit together."
Over the last 15-20 years more producers have gone to stopping fermentation - I believe mainly because they have, over the years become so familiar with their vineyards and their wines (and their acid levels) that they have a good feel for how much residual sugar should be left. It's probably also due to the fact that years ago many producers in rural Germany did not have access to the type of winery refrigeration that is so common today leading to the süssreserve technique. Nowadays its rare to find a quality producer who is making high end Prädikat wines with the süssreserve. I believe its still used a great deal for the lower end whites by the large producers and co-ops. In either case, the addition of just straight sugar after fermentation has always been looked upon as the least desirable method.
Posted by: R. Olsen-Harbich | January 26, 2010 at 08:32 AM
Damn - this discussion has me wishing I'd asked the winemakers about their use of süssreserve when I was in Germany last year.
I'd be willing to be that you can find excellent German Rieslings made using it. But then I have a serious sweet tooth...
Posted by: 1WineDude | January 26, 2010 at 08:41 AM
Rich:
I imagine that arresting fermentaion before there was sterile filtration and refrigeration was risky business.
I also would think that süssreserve would add some "juicy" aromas, for better or for worse.
Sugar vs. süssreserve has been studied in a few cases. Panels preferred süssreserve over sugar.
http://www.ajevonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/31/4/337
http://www.ajevonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/35/2/88
Stopped vs. Süssreserve vs. Muté:
http://ajevonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/55/2/168
Posted by: Tom Mansell | January 26, 2010 at 12:15 PM
Sincere Congratulations to Vinny and Billsboro, it's a pleasure to work with you.
Posted by: Ted Marks | January 26, 2010 at 01:41 PM
Although when you ask them, most high end German producers will say they only arrest fermentation, I wouldn't be surprised if a few did use a little süssreserve as well - just to tweak flavors a bit if the finished wine was still a little unbalanced. Kind of like an insurance policy.
Posted by: R. Olsen-Harbich | January 26, 2010 at 02:35 PM