By Julia Burke, Beer Editor
Genesee Brewing Company in Rochester, New York recently
announced the installation of a $3.5 million production line for the purpose of
packaging beer in 24 oz. cans. Explaining the decision, the brewery’s press
release cited customer demand for canned beers as well as sustainability
factors and the visual impact of cans on retail shelves. Expect to see more of the brewery’s
classics including Genesee, Genny Light and Genny Cream Ale in the can at your
local beer retailer.
From large macro-owned breweries like Genesee to tiny craft breweries, cans are popping up more and more often, and their advantages for both the customer and the brewery are often significant.
First there’s the environmental issue. If you’re drinking really local -- as in, drinking from your neighborhood brewery (and you should be, on a regular basis), the most environmentally friendly option is a reusable growler or keg from the brewery’s tap. Bottles are second-best for local drinking because the beer is just getting shipped to your corner store, so the weight factor of transporting it doesn’t cancel out the fact that glass bottles are less energy-intensive to produce. (For an excellent article on Slate magazine that explains these environmental issues in depth, click here: http://www.slate.com/id/2186219/ Special thanks to Matt Brewing Company rep Chris Miller for this link.)
Cans start to become the most environmentally responsible choice when your beer is hitting the road for long distances. With their lightweight packaging, cans are less energy intensive to transport. And for one reason or another, customers more commonly recycle cans than bottles -- which is good because there are more uses for recycled aluminum than for recycled glass. There are a lot of factors at play, but the obvious low transportation costs and warm consumer reception associated with canned beer mean it’s not just an environmental boon.
For Butternuts Beer & Ale, a leader in canned New York
beer, the advantages of cans were obvious from the start. “Butternuts Beer & Ale has been packaging all four
of their flagship beers in cans since the brewery started in 2005,” explains
owner/operator Chuck Williamson. “Cans have become a well-received package for
craft beer as of late.”
Williamson points out that
cans are part of the package that is the eye-catching Butternuts brand,
recognized for its brightly colored, wacky imagery. “One of the main reasons we
went to cans from the start was to stand out in the market. For a small brewery
start-up with limited funds we felt we could make a market impression with this
package coupled with our off-beat product labeling.”
Like most environmentally
conscious choices, the decision to use cans made financial sense too. “The
material cost per unit is lower as well which allows us to be price competitive
in a market where traditionally large brewers position themselves,” says
Williamson. “The packaging is lighter as well which means we can ship more
cases on a pallet saving on shipping and reducing our shipping demand. And
aluminum is nearly 100% recyclable so when you are through with your beer can
it may very well become a beer can again!”
Saranac, perhaps the most
prominent member of the Matt Brewing Company family of beers, is also embracing
the can. The brewery offers its Saranac Pale Ale in a 16 oz. can -- and it’s
widely held among New York beer lovers that the canned version tastes even
better than the bottled. “Basically, it’s one more option we can offer to our
customers,” explains Matt Brewing Co. representative Chris Miller. Saranac also
recycles all production and packaging materials including aluminum, which makes
the canned Pale Ale a superior green option even if you live near the brewery.
It’s obvious canned beer
isn’t just for mainstream macros anymore; the benefits are perfectly suited to
craft breweries as well. Do you have any favorite beers in cans?





Most cans have BPA in them. So no thanks.
Posted by: akatsuki | September 10, 2010 at 11:05 AM
I have BPA issues with cans as well. I'm with ya, no thanks!
Posted by: Bill | September 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM
My understanding with the Bisphenol-A (BPA) scare is that the main concern is for infants drinking from baby bottles that may allow BPA to leach into the milk.
For adults, you'd have to ingest quite a bit of BPA to be at increased risk for health problems, according to www.bisphenol-A.org:
"Based on the results of the SPI study, the estimated dietary intake of BPA from can coatings is less than 0.00011 milligrams per kilogram body weight per day. This level is more than 450 times lower than the maximum acceptable or “reference” dose for BPA of 0.05 milligrams per kilogram body weight per day established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Stated another way, an average adult consumer would have to ingest more than 230 kilograms (or about 500 pounds) of canned food and beverages every day for an entire lifetime to exceed the safe level of BPA set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency."
Of course, studies about BPA not being dangerous could be funded by companies that use aluminum cans. It could all be a huge conspiracy. But what's known is that BPA has been in our food and beverage products for over 40 years, and there seem to be a lot of other things killing us faster these days.
If you're concerned about BPA, sure, don't drink or eat food from cans. But the validity of the media scare turned out to be so controversial that I didn't feel the need to put a warning note on this article; some would argue that beer itself will kill you, and I didn't want to get into that discussion.
From what I've read, I would definitely not recommend giving small children canned beer, mainly because you'll be arrested but also because of BPA. I did shoot emails to a few can-using brewers to get their two cents on this issue; stay tuned. Tom, if you know anything about BPA health studies, your input is always appreciated. Knowing that you're a fan of Genny Bock, however, I'm guessing you're as unalarmed as I am.
Posted by: Julia Burke | September 10, 2010 at 12:10 PM
Julia,
Another great article. Nice read. One of my favorite things about craft beer embracing cans is the versatility. I can now drink good beer in places that glass bottles are not allowed like beaches and golf courses (some). Was able to enjoy some Pork Slap at the Saratoga Race Track this summer.
akatsuki and Bill,
The small amount of BPA is not alarming to me, but if you want to stay away, that is your choice. I only hope though that you make those choices across the board. If you eat anything from McDonald's your are probably putting more harmful stuff in your body than any small amount of BPA from a can.
Kevin
P.S. Am I the only one who's first though when hearing "BPA" was Ommegang's beer?
Posted by: Kevin Burns | September 11, 2010 at 11:37 AM
Kevin - thanks! The portability aspect of canned beer is a huge benefit, especially if you're camping, backpacking, or kayaking, all enterprises made much more fun with beer.
And I totally thought of Ommegang too :)
Posted by: Julia Burke | September 11, 2010 at 01:16 PM
Validity of the media scare turned out to be so controversial that I didn't feel the need to put a warning note on this article; some would argue that beer itself will kill you, and I didn't want to get into that discussion.
Posted by: beco baby carrier | October 25, 2010 at 12:56 PM