Heavy, over-manipulated chardonnay is one of the wine community’s least appealing members, at least in the eyes, and palate, of this wine lover. Wine geeks often label these wines “flabby” but I compare drinking them to sucking on a butter-slathered two by four. And, despite what some sales-minded winemakers will tell you, pairing these wines with food is a crapshoot at best.
Of course, chardonnay is a key chameleon variety, with a seemingly endless array of styles. On one end you have crisp, fruity, acidic chardonnay — those that don’t spend any time in oak barrels during or after the fermentation process. These wines tend to be lighter yellow color and their flavors lean toward green apples and tart citrus with a crisp, clean mouthfeel.
On the opposite end of the style spectrum are chardonnays that look like liquid gold. These wines have been born and raised in oak barrels and have gone through a process called malolactic fermentation — the conversion of malic acid to lactic acid — which gives the wine a fuller, more viscous feel in the mouth. The flavor profile in these wines is also richer, with more baked apple, butterscotch, buttery toast, vanilla and even popcorn.
Locally, chardonnay is the second most-planted variety (even more than merlot)
and most wineries produce at least two different styles. As Alexandra
Macari of Macari Vineyards puts it, this is because, “Some consumers,
especially women, love the oak with the buttery style, while others
enjoy the food friendly style of steel-fermented chardonnays.”
While oaky, “California-style” Chardonnay remains immensely popular in the United States, there is a shift afoot towards less-manipulated wines that allow the fruit’s true identity to shine through. Macari thinks “……we all drank too many oaky (chardonnays) in the late 80s and early 90s from California.” This has led to a proliferation of steel-fermented bottlings (or ones that are made mostly of steel-fermented wine).
Long Island winemakers seem to be doing a particularly good job bringing the best out of Chardonnay fruit — without being heavy handed with oak. Barbara Shinn, co-owner of Shinn Estate Vineyards explains their decision to make only one chardonnay — a crisp, fruity one. “The Long Island terroir is not suited for wines produced in a Napa Valley, California style. (And our) customers have been very enthusiastic about our chardonnay, even those who have sworn off of chardonnay altogether.”
Slowly but surely, card-carrying members of ABC (“Anything But Chardonnay”) are trying chardonnay again. Look for this trend to continue.
So how can you tell if that bottle of Chardonnay on the wine store shelf is heavy and buttery or crisp and fruity? It’s not always easy because wineries aren’t required to tell you that sort of information on the label. But, there are two hints that can help — especially with wines produced on Long Island.
If you see the word “reserve” on a bottle and it costs over $20, chances are it was aged in oak barrels and will be a bit fuller bodied and have some toasty or butterscotch character. Wines raised in oak barrels cost more because the barrels are expensive. Some bottles from other regions, like Australia or California, will label steel-fermented wines as “naked” or simply “unoaked.”
It’s important to remember that relatively few local chardonnays, even if they are barrel fermented and aged, fall into the “flabby” category. The climate that makes the East End so ideal for grapes usually results in enough acidity to bring balance. And, most winemakers seem reluctant to pummel us with oak.
Some Long Island steel-fermented chardonnays, to try:
- Channing Daughters Winery 2005 Scuttlehole Chardonnay ($14) (Read more)
- Macari Vineyards 2003 Estate Chardonnay ($15) (Read more)
- Peconic Bay Winery 2003 Steel Fermented Chardonnay ($13) (Read More)
- Raphael 2004 Grand Cru ($15) (Read more)
Thanks for the roundup of wines and talking about this encouraging trend. Hallelujah!
Posted by: Terry Hughes | February 10, 2006 at 02:34 PM
I also enjoy the trend toward steel fermented Chardonnays, although there are many lovely oaked versions, here and throughout the world, moderation,of course, is key. The real reason I'm writing though is to point out that Merlot actually is the most widely planted variety, according to the most recent survey done by
the LIWC
Posted by: Ben | February 10, 2006 at 04:25 PM
Ben,
Really? I'll make that correction here on teh site...do you know when these numbers came out?
Should I also assume that you're taking over the vineyard management for Leucadia's new venture on LI? :)
Posted by: Lenn | February 10, 2006 at 04:36 PM
I've noticed this trend in the Washington Chardonnays, too. I've heard people speak of them as being done in the "French Style" which is normally a much cleaner taste.
I am surprised by Ms. Marcari's comment. I've been complaining of "getting splinters" while drinking Chardonnay for years. And it seems to me that the big oak would appeal more to the "manly" palate. But that's just my non-scientific observation of my friends and acquaintances.
Anyway, the point you are making is good for the industry and consumers alike. Getting back to the true nature of chardonnay is a welcome trend.
~ B
Posted by: Culinary Fool | February 11, 2006 at 02:31 PM
The trend you've identified and explained quite well can't accelerate fast enough for my taste. If oak is the first thing I notice on either the nose or palate, it's an immediate turnoff. I suspect too many winemakers saw barrel fermentation, oak aging or chips/dust as a masking agent for thin, innocuous chardonnay juice. Doesn't work. The gig's up.
Posted by: Mark (Uncorked in Ohio) | February 11, 2006 at 06:09 PM