By Contributing Columnist Robin Mererdith
I'd like to welcome Robin Meredith as LENNDEVOURS' newest contributor. He is the former owner of Broadfields Wine Cellars and The Tasting Room on the North Fork of Long Island. He is now preparing to begin his Master of Wine education.
If you've ever had a glass of wine that smelled of moldy cardboard, wet dog, or dingy basement, you've experienced a "corked wine." Saldy, corked wines are ruined and there's no resuscitating them.
Most of the time, corked wine is caused by 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA), a hard-to-pronounce compound that taints the aromas and flavors of anywhere from 3% to 15% of the bottles we purchase, depending on whose estimates you believe. But — this is but one of the ways that natural cork fails us.
That’s why, for me, it was love at first twist. The first time I encountered a screw capped wine — not counting all those three liter bottles of Gallo Hearty Burgundy back in college — I knew this was something I wanted more of.
Cork’s most basic function is to act as a seal — keeping wine in and air out. Unfortunately, as anyone who has ever stumbled across a sticky, leaky bottle knows, cork can’t even be counted on for this seemingly simple job. Entire vintages have been compromised by poor cork seals. And, because cork is a democratic troublemaker, this can happen to the world's best wines as well as more humble ones. The 1989 Chateaneuf du Pape from Chateau de Beaucastel, a Wine Spectator #1 wine of the year, was notoriously plagued by leaky corks.
Cork has also been implicated in the premature oxidation of several recent vintages of white Burgunies. It is believed that a chemical applied to corks during the manufacturing process wasn’t rinsed off properly, and contaminated the wines, leaving them exposed to oxidation. Countless $100+ bottles of wine were effectively ruined.
We tend to think of screw caps primarily as a way to sidestep the downfalls of natural cork, but they have some unique positive attributes of their own. The plastic liners that create the seal in screw cap closures come in two versions — semi-permeable, which allow some oxygen in over time and essentially mimic natural cork, and non-permeable, ones that a perfect seal, eliminating oxygen exchange entirely.
These non-permeable liners allow winemakers to bottle wines with lower sulfur levels, eliminating some of the “shock” caused by sulfur additions before bottling. This is especially beneficial for crisp, aromatic whites and roses that are at their best soon after bottling.
Are Screw Caps the Answer?
Given all of the advantages, why aren’t Long Island wineries using screw cap closures? I asked Russell Hearn, winemaker at Pellegrini Vineyards and Director of Winemaking at Premium Wine Group, a shared winemaking facility in Mattituck that produces wines for Martha Clara Vineyards, Lieb Family Cellars, Schneider Vineyards, and a handful of other East End producers. Earlier this summer he organized a seminar on screw cap closures and he has probably thought more about this topic than most.
He told me that “It seems like there is a certain amount of fence-sitting at the moment. Everyone likes the idea, but there is some reluctance to be the first one to take the plunge.”
Marketplace resistance is a very real concern, both from consumers and, perhaps more importantly, from members of the retail and restaurant trade who are concerned that consumers will reject wines with screw caps.
But, as with so many things, the decision ultimately comes down to dollars and cents, and this is where it gets interesting. Wineries can save money on raw materials by converting to screw caps. A high-quality cork and custom capsule may cost as much as $.50 to $.60 per bottle, while an equivalent screw cap closure runs between $.15 and $.20. According to Hearn, “You don’t get much change back from $100,000” when you modify an existing bottling line to handle screw caps. This means a winery would break even on the investment in screw caps after about 22,000 cases.
The problem with this scenario is that wineries are more likely to utilize screw caps on their less expensive wines, and traditional closure costs for these wines can be much lower than $.50. An inexpensive synthetic cork and generic foil capsule can cost as little as $.20 per bottle, leaving you with a savings of a few pennies per unit and an astronomic break even point that can be many years away. Of course, inexpensive synthetic corks have their own quality issues.
Will We Ever See Screw Caps on Long Island?
Probably. Wineries are quite adept at pooling their resources and coming up with novel solutions to problems like this one. There are several mobile bottling lines on the West Coast that literally drive up to the winery and hook up their hoses when it’s time for bottling, and a few of these have screw cap capabilities. We don’t have anything like that in the eastern U.S., but it sounds like the sort of business opportunity someone must be taking a hard look at.
A shared winemaking facility like Premium Wine Group is another logical place to make the investment, since the costs can be shared (at least indirectly) among a large group of wineries. Hearn estimates that he would need a commitment of 30,000 cases per year to justify making the investment in screw cap machinery at Premium. Once that machinery was in place, it would be available to all East End wineries (not just those who are currently making their wines at Premium).
So what is a small, quality-oriented winery to do in the meantime? According to Christopher Tracy, winemaker for Channing Daughters, “cleanliness, a good trustworthy cork supplier, and no chlorine-based products in or around the winery” go a long way toward mitigating the problems associated with cork. And he reminds us that screw caps are not a panacea — “oxidation, reduction, and TCA from other sources (e.g. cardboard, wood) are all still a problem.”
Or, according to the always quotable Roman Roth from Wolffer Estate, “if some of the huge monster-sized wineries would use screw caps or synthetic cork there would be plenty of good cork for us smaller traditional and quality-oriented wineries”.
As with so many things in the wine business, there are no straight answers when it comes to closures.
Robin,
Miss your winery. I just had a bottle of your Broadfields 2002 Cab Franc last night and it was ageing exceptionally well. I've got 1 bottle left... I only wish I had more.
As for screw caps, I might miss the tradition of using a hand cork screw, but I won't miss pouring out bad bottles. So let the revolution begin - bring on the screw caps!
Posted by: Dave | March 23, 2007 at 10:55 AM
Hi Robin,
I'm curious about your statement, "Of course, inexpensive synthetic corks have their own quality issues."
Nowhere in your article did you enumerate any of these quality issues, and I'm curious what they are.
My only complaint about them is that my screwpull opener seems pushes these corks into the bottle rather than pull them out...
Posted by: Randy | March 23, 2007 at 12:19 PM
Randy,
That comment was added by our all powerful editor, so I will defer to him for a response :)
I've actually broken a few corkscrews on those damn synthetic corks, so I share your pain...
Posted by: Robin Meredith | March 23, 2007 at 01:07 PM
I don't remember adding that (this piece was edited months ago) but I do have some concerns with synthetic corks.
One is the one you both mention...they can be impossible to get out of the bottle.
Two, I know that some synthetics are made with completely inert compounds, but I have had some wines bottled with some that are clearly not inert--there were definite burnt rubber-type notes on the nose.
Three, I've had several oxidized bottles...and in doing a little research, apparently the synthetic corks can sometimes let more air in that natural cork because it doesn't compress and then expand the way natural cork does.
I say bring on the screwcaps!
The all powerful editor!
Posted by: Lenn | March 23, 2007 at 03:34 PM
Over the past several years, the study of synthetic corks has shown them to be at best, a temporary solution to the problem of natural cork taint. Researchers at Cornell and elsewhere have shown that the material used in "plastic" corks breaks down from the acids and alcohol in wine after only a few years. Most studies show that these closures will last 2-4 years at most. Not a very good product. Screw caps are a far better alternative to natural cork and have shown to last at least 30 years with positive results.
Posted by: R. Olsen-Harbich | March 23, 2007 at 05:48 PM
So let me ask the leading question... if a plastic cork can be a problem, and there is a little piece of plastic in every screwcap that performs the actual seal, then why isn't the plastic in the screwcap a similar problem?
(We only use screwcaps on wines that we release immediately...)
Posted by: jeff | March 23, 2007 at 06:15 PM
From what I understand it's a physics issue. Synthetic corks are made from polymers used to create the air spaces or bubbles which can contract to create the seal (like the pores in a natural cork) These "bubbles" begin to break over time reducing elasticity leading to failure. The screw cap seal depends on the torque of the cap forced down tightly over a threaded glass bottle. It seems the exposure of the smaller surface area on the top of the cap is not affected as much. In fact there are some screw caps that have been developed by Stelvin that are supposedly more porous in order to allow the wine greater oxygen exchange.
Posted by: R. Olsen-Harbich | March 23, 2007 at 07:24 PM
I'm new to the world of wine but you make an excellent case for screwcaps. I will look further into this..
Thanks!
Posted by: Catherine | March 24, 2007 at 01:35 PM
What about this alternative closure?
http://www.alcoa.com/csi/north_america/en/product.asp?cat_id=1464&prod_id=2873
Posted by: Matt | March 25, 2007 at 10:09 AM
Came across your article on screw caps and I am all for it. But...I did have an experience with one the other night. The screw top was damaged when I brought the wine home from the store. I did not notice it till I laid it in my wine rack and it started dripping. I drank the wine anyway and found that it was still good. If you are interested, see my post regarding this cap with photo on my blog. Thanks!
Posted by: Deb | March 26, 2007 at 11:06 AM
ah, Robin, couldn't stay away, could ya? Well, welcome back, welcome back!
Posted by: Christopher Watkins | March 28, 2007 at 11:49 AM
I posted back on March 23rd (as Dave) that I just had an 02 Cab Franc that was wonderful and had only 1 left. Well as of last night, I'm now officially (and unfortunately) out of Broadfields wine from my cellar.
The 02 Franc was excellent last night... even better than I remember from March. It really aged nicely and did not in any way seem to be fading or past its prime.
Now I REALLY wish I had some more stocked around.
Posted by: Foley | November 08, 2007 at 02:44 PM